THE GREAT PYRAMID’S THREE CHAMBER
For myself the question was never, who built the pyramids? For even if we knew definitively who built them that does not tell us anything other then its vast antiquity. Rather the question should be: why were the pyramids on the Gizeh Plateau built? Yes, the Egyptologists can point to funerary texts, painted in some remote and distant pyramids far removed from the Gizeh Plateau and suggest that the primary purpose the pyramids were constructed was to bury dead pharaohs. This mode of thought does not run parallel to the evidence unearthed on the Gizeh Plateau where no funerary texts or dead pharaoh was ever found.
Do not get me wrong pyramids are symbolic tombs as is the world the tomb the soul has been interred into. It is just that the pyramids on the Gizeh Plateau were found empty, without mummies or funerary texts. In other words how can you bury that which was never born? Anyone that imagines the funerary texts found in the tombs of the pharaohs were never meant to be read are about as dimwitted as one can get. Those that have read the historical documents of the Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians know well that they themselves excavated archeological sites that were thousands of years old. Did these advance cultures not know that human nature would demand the excavations of their own tombs? For Egyptologists to think otherwise is self-delusional. When did not the human race defile the graves of previous generations? Judges in modern cities are constantly uprooting cemeteries and displacing them because of corporate greed. It is cheaper, you see, to displace graves to obtain land for superstores or shopping malls then it is to purchase more expensive property in the inner cities. I find it very interesting that the Sacred Scriptures warns of those that would rob you of all your treasure but beware of those that would destroy your soul. It is interesting that any treasure of intrinsic value would be found in the tombs at all. It was probably put there to appease the mythical grave robber. The true treasure of those Pharaohnic tombs is the funerary texts found on the walls. If there were any gold or silver stolen from the tombs it has all turn to chaff by the winds of time. The only thing that endured is the funerary texts. If it was the intention of the tomb builders to leave a funerary text behind, if a dead pharaoh’s spirit was to become restless and needed to read it, why not leave it in scrolls? Because scrolls can be hand carried out of the tomb: they also have the tendency of deteriorating at a faster pace. Paintings on the walls of the tomb cannot be carried out and therefore are left for posterity. None of this seems to be reasoned out by the archeologists of our day because they are right on top of the problem. They have subjectively entered those tombs and have endured their foul smells and have brought upon themselves the curse of the pharaohs. They need to step back from the scene and reason objectively with what they have. As the evidence accumulates over time one must need to revise his theories, there is no shame in that, but Egyptologists have found a comfortable niche in their thought processes and will not give up the old ghost of past theories. This is the death the curse of the pharaohs speaks of.
The work of Robert Bauval on the ‘astroglyphic’ alignment of the pyramids on the Gizeh Plateau to the constellation of Orion, and the alignment of the southern shaft of the Queen’s Chamber to the star Sirius, more then demonstrates that the ancient Egyptians were extremely intelligent people. This shows they incorporated knowledge of advance mathematics and astronomical data into the monuments and buildings of their culture. People with this kind of knowledge do not believe in mumbo jumbo no matter what the outer façade of their religion may have to say.
Even the funerary text of the ancient Egyptians and their hieroglyphics system of writing is certainly evidence of a highly advance civilization. On one hand the argument that highly intelligent cultures would not spend their time and efforts in something as mundane as burying the dead is totally without merit when you see that is exactly what the Egyptians did. It is as if it is all a sledge of hand maneuver to get the observer that is looking in one direction occupied while something more important is taking place in another direction. This is similar to how a magician performs his tricks on stage, or how the politicians work the media in Washington.
It is not my onus to go headlong into explanations of the Egyptian culture, for that Herculean task was for others to accomplish by wading into that maelstrom to their chagrin. The maze that modern Egyptologists had built up around their theology and dogma antedate Jean François Champollion, who deciphered the Rosetta stone. History tells us that the library books on Egypt had to be cleansed from the shelves to make room for the new influx of publications on the subject. Where those dusty and outdates volumes went is anyone’s guess: the homes of diehard Egyptologists that refuse to give up their cherished theories and dogma. This is why modern Egyptologists are so entrenched in their ancient and outdated belief systems. They were educated by the preceding generations of frustrated and disgruntled Egyptologists.
The following sections deal with the Gizeh Plateau will only deal with the Three Chambers of the Great Pyramid and other works that throw light on the knowledge we are seeking in relationship to the first chapter of Genesis.
THE KING’S CHAMBER
The measurements of the King’s Chamber are 34’4” in length, 17’2” in width, and 19’1” in height. These measurements have been verified through several sources being that these are the most recent for my purposes. The ancient Egyptians used the Royal Cubit (20.6”) is their measurement system. This does not say that the Egyptians did not have the use of the inch in mind when they structured the Great Pyramid. I also fully grasp that there may well be minor fractional variations of the inch sacrificed in the interplay of these two systems: the Royal Cubit (RC) and the Inch. The overall results of the calculations are the convincing points in my argument.
In the King’s Chamber the length is 20 RCs, the width is 10 RCs, and the height is 11.11 RCs. The overall volume of the King’s Chamber would be 2222 RCs. This is a bit of a play on the 22-letters of the Hebrew Alphabet. Making this relationship concerning the 22-Hebrew letters seems a bit of a stretch but it will make more sense in a little while. Dividing 22 into 2222 emits the quotient of 101. Since the chamber is divided into two 10 x 10 Royal Cubits it could be said that each half commands 50.5 * 22 RCs. I have previously on this forum introduced a 10 x 10 square, which directly relates to the overall mathematics of the first chapter of Genesis. This matrix is numbered 1-100. The aggregate of 100 is 5050, which gives each section of the 100-part matrix an average of 50.5. There can be no doubt that this matrix was inferred in the structuring of the King’s Chamber in the Great Pyramid. Graham Hancock also tells us, on one of his video’s that the King’s Chamber is constructed of exactly 100 granite blocks.
What fascinated me about these calculations in the Great Pyramid is that the length of the King’s Chamber 34’4” equals 412” or the total numerical value, via gematria, of BETH: the first-letters of the Torah. In addition the width of the chamber 17’2” equals 206” or the amount of words in the 5th and 6th Days of Creation in the first chapter of Genesis. Finally the height of the chamber 19’1” equal 229” or the amount of words in the rest of the first chapter of Genesis: ‘the 2 x 1 rectangle’s height is exactly equivalent to half the corner to corner diagonal of the floor plan of the King Chamber’ . This would mean that the people that built the Great Pyramid were aware of the first word of Genesis being broken down into two words to produce 435-words to the first chapter of Genesis. The first chapter of Genesis has 434-words, however, the first word of Genesis can be shown to be two words. I find that these kinds of calculations are a bit too much to be considered coincidence. I was able to extrapolate the calculations of a sphere just from the first letter of Genesis? There I was able to show a 3-dimensional reality. This is exactly what I am doing in the King’s Chamber. Not that we don’t already know that it is a 3-dimensional space state but rather I am unaware of anyone looking at these three chambers in the Great Pyramids in just this way: as calculating each of the three dimensional space states. We have seen where the Torah tells us that within this sphere the 22-letters of the alphabet go out from the center to fills all creation. Is this not in a sense what the King’s Chamber has told us?
What I further find intriguing with these three calculations giving the length, width, and height of the King’s Chamber is that they total to 847”. This definitely gives the overall total as being 70’7”or the number of the god Hermes (707). But I also know that the square root of the #2 is 1.4142: * 5 * 10 = 70.71. The ancient used calculations using zeroes or dropping zeros within their symbolic framework. This 70.71 calculation looks nice but its overall value is 1½” too much. As it stands this is a totally unacceptable calculation because of that 1½-inch. It is a bit surprising that the calculation of the square root of the #2 times 5 would produce a like calculation as that of what the inches produce with its different system. The number five is associated to the Sun sign in Astrology: Leo. The Sun is ruler of the solar system as is the lion king of the jungle. The number five is the central number in which all other digits surround in the Kamea of Saturn. The planet Saturn is said to have something to do with the Great Pyramid.
Another interesting point concerning the King’s Chamber is in relationship to its volume. When calculating length x width x height the volume is known. The calculation in the King’s Chamber is 34.3… x 17.16… x 19.083… = 11247.504622205… (Square feet) / 5280 = 2.1302092… (Or 2.13) square miles. Notice how 2.13 square miles is very similar to the Genesis Formula outlined in another post: 2/1/3. The difference between 2.1302092 and 2.13 is 1.1 square feet. It is less than 1/10,000th of the total volume of the King’s Chamber. I believe that such a margin of error, if it can be called that, is within an acceptable range.
THE QUEEN’S CHAMBER
In the Queen Chamber using the formula as outline above is 56’5”, whereby the length is 18’10”, the width is 17’2”, and the height is 20’5”. These measurements total to 677”: the length 226”, the width 206”, and the height 245”. Again when you take the square root of the #2: 1.4142 * 4 * 10 = 56.568, the calculation is pretty close because it appears at first blush to be equal to 56’5” but it likewise is off by almost two inches. In Astrology the #4 is associated with the Moon’s sign and it is considered the Queen of the solar system and the consort of the Sun.
The tunnel going from the Grand Galley to the Queen’s Chamber is exactly 127’, which equal 1524”: 847” King Chamber and 677” Queen’s Chamber. Sarah, Abraham’s wife, died at the age of 127. The first-verse of Genesis has a total numerical value of 2701, which is the transposition of 127. When the #127 is divided by the #9: the combine total of the King & Queen’s chambers (5 and 4), the quotient is 14.111111. Calculating the King’s Chamber: 5 * 14.111111 = 70.555555 * 12 = 846.666666. The Queen’s Chamber: 4 * 14.111111 = 56.444444 * 12 = 677.333333. In a real sense the King’s Chamber symbolically represents 0.555555 and the Queen’s Chamber 0.444444. Therefore, calculating 0.555555 * 127 results in 70.555485 and 0.444444 * 127 results in 56.444388: combined they equal 126.999873 or 127.
It would appear that the mathematical incongruities initially spotted in the King and the Queen’s chambers are worked out in the Queen’s tunnel. This goes to adding credence to the idea that these chambers were worked out with the square root of the #2. If anyone doubts that these two chambers relate to each other they should ask themselves why both chamber totaled to the exact length of the Queen’s Chamber’s tunnel.
It is said that there was no particular reason that these chambers were given names. I believe that they were given names because of their proximity to each other. It was only natural that such names would be given to them. Now these above calculations confirm those fledgling inspirational thoughts of those that named these chambers two centuries or more ago. I believe that the ancient Egyptians were using all their powers of observation and the psychological understanding of human behavior in order that the proper speculation were made about the different aspects of the Gizeh Plateau complex.
THE SUBTERRANEAN CHAMBER
The Subterranean Chamber has a total of 1015”. The length equals to 46’, the width equals 27’1”, and the height equals 11’6”. These measurements total to 84’7”: the length equals 552”, the width 325”, and the “maximum height” 138”. Note also how the Subterranean Chamber 84’7” seems to be mimicking the calculations of the King’s Chamber 847”, or is that vice versa? Materiality always attempts to displace spirituality by claiming equality. And again using the square root of the #2: 1.4142 * 6 * 10 = 84.852 and of course this is over 3-inches more then the Subterranean Chamber attest to. Now the only way around this is to calculate the Subterranean Chamber as if it was part of the 127’ tunnel connecting to the Queen’s Chamber. When 0.666666 multiplies 127 the results are 84.666582. This is a totally unacceptable calculation. It would give the Subterranean Chamber 84’8” which is one inch too much. Both other times when calculations 0.444444 & 0.555555 was used the results were acceptable. Why in this case not? I began to play with this figure 0.666666 and found that the only appropriate range to calculate 127’ in relationship to the Subterranean Chamber was 0.666, which produced the result 84.582 (0.666 * 127). The number of the Beast is 666 mentioned in John’s Revelation. The proper abode of the Beast is Hell or the underworld, which the Subterranean Chamber represents. Furthermore, the 1015” found in the Subterranean Chamber seems to relate directly to the second, third and fourth chapters of Genesis insofar as they hold in their precincts 1015-Hebrew words. One other point is that the word Light in the first day of creation and the word Darkness totals to 1015. The word Darkness has a dual numeric value because it uses one of the final five letters of the Hebrew alphabet (22 + 5 = 27-letters). I do not myself use the final letters’ numeric values in my use of gematria. I believe it is a subjective choice to be made but this particular point on Light and Darkness was worth mentioning.
I do want to mention that the Subterranean Chamber is known to have many lengths, widths and; heights because it was thought to be an unfinished project abandoned for a higher niche in the center of the pyramid. This is at least the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries theory as to why the Subterranean and Queen chambers were abandoned for an even higher niche. The problem is that the Queen’s Chamber was completed. In fact it was so complete that the theoretical airshafts, and they are still called that by Egyptologists to this day, were walled over. The shafts were mere inches from the wall of the Queen’s Chamber when an energetic individual started tapping the walls. He had a brilliant idea that escaped the senior Egyptologists of his day. He figured that if the King’s Chamber had airshafts then why not the Queen’s Chamber? I wondered if he was booted out of Egyptology in short order for using pure logic in his reasoning. But the different measurements of the Subterranean Chamber are acceptable if one realizes that a ruse is being played out. If someone was to start measuring the Subterranean Chamber and he finds different lengths, widths, and heights he may well throw up his hands in disgust. One measurement off throws all other calculations into chaos. We will see that in a minute. Imagine crawling in that chamber to get the proper calculations. It must have been difficult climbing up on those rocks and taking the various measurements. We can only be grateful that the early researchers had the fortitude to do it right. What get me about these measurements is that they were there all the time. The ancients must have counted upon the childlike attention spans of those who would try prematurely to take those measurements. Who would have thought that the most extreme measurements taken, in the subterranean chamber, in relationship to its height, width, and length would be the most important?
Ask yourself this question, when the Great Pyramid was built and the Subterranean Chamber was suppose to be the burial place of the pharaoh, why was it not perfected as was the Queen and King’s chambers were later on? If you build from the ground up or let us say from the basement up you would complete these areas first because a massive structure is about to be built over them. This kind of thinking never seemed to have visited the minds of those that had the authority to research the Great Pyramid in modern times.
ALL THREE CHAMBERS OF THE GREAT PYRAMIDS
The calculations of all three chambers total to 211’7”, or 211.583…’ the King’s Chamber 70’7”, the Queen’s Chamber 56’5”, and the Subterranean Chamber 84’7. This is a grand total of 2539”: the King’s Chamber 847”, the Queen’s Chamber 677”, and the Subterranean Chamber 1015”. It is these calculations that we have worked towards in unraveling some of the secrets locked into the granite stone structure of the Great Pyramid.
Since I was working with the square root of the #2 it would seem to me to be logical to multiply it by 100. There are several reasons for this: the first reason is that I had been working with Dante Alighieri’s La Divina Commedia, which relates to the first chapter of Genesis and it was structure with 100-chapters. The second reason is that the #2539 is too close to half of 5050, which is the aggregate of 100. I had to see what that was all about. And the third reason is because Graham Hancock tells us that the King’s Chamber is made with exactly 100-blocks. Also because 211’7” is well over 100 times the square root of #2. Hence the reasons for multiplying the square root of the #2 by 100.
We have been working with the square root of the #2, which the short version is 1.4142. A slightly longer version when multiplied by 100 is 141.4213562, which when subtracted from 211.583… = 70.16197713 / 211.583… = 0.33160446 * 14,233 = 4719.72627918.
What I just did above in this calculation was to take the full measurements of the three chambers (211.583…) and subtract the square root of the #2 * 100 (141.4213562) from that total. The remainder (70.16197713) would then be divided by 211.583… to determine the percentage of the three chambers remaining and not included in the square root of the #2 * 100. The result of that last part of the calculation is very close to another set of calculations that I was working on in Dante Alighieri’s La Divina Commedia. When I multiplied 0.33160446 by the total amount of verses in the La Divina Commedia (14,233) the results was stunning: 4719.72627918. La Divina Commedia is made up of three volumes: Inferno, Purgatorio and the Paradiso. The Inferno has exactly 4720-verses. You could see why I would be surprise. Where would Dante Alighieri living in the late thirteenth century AD have received knowledge of the inner structure of the Great Pyramid? Whatever resource Dante used to obtain his data that archive had to be privy to a great deal more information about the esoteric science then I have been able to envisage.